<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ABAP Freak Show – July 1st – ABAP OO Tutorial Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/2009/07/01/abap-freak-show-%e2%80%93-july-1st-%e2%80%93-abap-oo-tutorial-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/2009/07/01/abap-freak-show-%e2%80%93-july-1st-%e2%80%93-abap-oo-tutorial-part-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:33:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sureshchinta</title>
		<link>http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/2009/07/01/abap-freak-show-%e2%80%93-july-1st-%e2%80%93-abap-oo-tutorial-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3598</link>
		<dc:creator>sureshchinta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/?p=1261#comment-3598</guid>
		<description>hi Thomus ,

Heartly appreciated for ur Webdynpro topics,Very nice and interested ...iam start learning with ur abap oops and webdynpro topics always i used to watch ur videos..
very useful to every sap men.

Thanking you and Warm regards
Suresh chinta
sap consultant
Hyderabad
India</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Thomus ,</p>
<p>Heartly appreciated for ur Webdynpro topics,Very nice and interested &#8230;iam start learning with ur abap oops and webdynpro topics always i used to watch ur videos..<br />
very useful to every sap men.</p>
<p>Thanking you and Warm regards<br />
Suresh chinta<br />
sap consultant<br />
Hyderabad<br />
India</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crepmaster</title>
		<link>http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/2009/07/01/abap-freak-show-%e2%80%93-july-1st-%e2%80%93-abap-oo-tutorial-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3233</link>
		<dc:creator>crepmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/?p=1261#comment-3233</guid>
		<description>Thanx Ed! the concept is clearer now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx Ed! the concept is clearer now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Herrmann</title>
		<link>http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/2009/07/01/abap-freak-show-%e2%80%93-july-1st-%e2%80%93-abap-oo-tutorial-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3230</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Herrmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/?p=1261#comment-3230</guid>
		<description>Hi Crep, you can&#039;t use perform statements inside of methods.  You should definitely build a new method for any block of code that will be called multiple times.  You can declare the method as private if it is only to be used inside the class, and not by outside callers of the class.

-ewH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Crep, you can&#8217;t use perform statements inside of methods.  You should definitely build a new method for any block of code that will be called multiple times.  You can declare the method as private if it is only to be used inside the class, and not by outside callers of the class.</p>
<p>-ewH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crepmaster</title>
		<link>http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/2009/07/01/abap-freak-show-%e2%80%93-july-1st-%e2%80%93-abap-oo-tutorial-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3229</link>
		<dc:creator>Crepmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/?p=1261#comment-3229</guid>
		<description>Hy Thomas thanx for the tutorial ( i&#039;m at part 3 :) ) .
Is it possible to use a perfom inside a method like something like this.
method alfa.
select * from ztable into it_ztable
where blablabla.
loop at it_ztable assigning .
perform complete_data.
endloop.

if yes, how should i declare the data in the form to use it_ztable data?
Is it better build a new method?
Thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hy Thomas thanx for the tutorial ( i&#8217;m at part 3 <img src='http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) .<br />
Is it possible to use a perfom inside a method like something like this.<br />
method alfa.<br />
select * from ztable into it_ztable<br />
where blablabla.<br />
loop at it_ztable assigning .<br />
perform complete_data.<br />
endloop.</p>
<p>if yes, how should i declare the data in the form to use it_ztable data?<br />
Is it better build a new method?<br />
Thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Jung</title>
		<link>http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/2009/07/01/abap-freak-show-%e2%80%93-july-1st-%e2%80%93-abap-oo-tutorial-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Jung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprisegeeks.com/blog/?p=1261#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>&gt;always thought that ABAP was originally procedural due to the fact that it was somehow compiled down to C (I’m not sure why I assumed this)

ABAP doesn&#039;t really compile down to C code.  The confusion is maybe the fact that the ABAP Compiler and the ABAP virtual machine are both implemented in C/C++. However ABAP creates a byte code that is interpreted by the ABAP virtual machine - actually a lot like the way Java works. But this doesn&#039;t really effect OO/Procedural.

ABAP was procedural simply because that was the way most programming languages were designed when ABAP first came about.  Procedural ABAP design is largely a mixture of concepts from COBOL and C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;always thought that ABAP was originally procedural due to the fact that it was somehow compiled down to C (I’m not sure why I assumed this)</p>
<p>ABAP doesn&#8217;t really compile down to C code.  The confusion is maybe the fact that the ABAP Compiler and the ABAP virtual machine are both implemented in C/C++. However ABAP creates a byte code that is interpreted by the ABAP virtual machine &#8211; actually a lot like the way Java works. But this doesn&#8217;t really effect OO/Procedural.</p>
<p>ABAP was procedural simply because that was the way most programming languages were designed when ABAP first came about.  Procedural ABAP design is largely a mixture of concepts from COBOL and C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

